It appears that the antitrust agencies are more vigilant to protect the interests of vodka drinkers than beer drinkers. As explained in the June 6, 2008 Post, the Antitrust Division was not concerned that there would be negative effects on competition if Coors and Molson formed a joint venture. However, the FTC has taken the opposite view in a merger among spirit makers because it effectively would put Absolut and Stolichnaya under the control of one company. The buyer Pernot Ricard will gain control V&S Vin Spirit’s Absolut and has a distribution agreement that covers Stolichnaya, In analyzing the transaction, the FTC defined the market as super premium brands of vodka and claimed that consumers viewed Absolut and Stolichnaya as their top two choices. Without discussing market shares, the Analysis to Aid Public Comment asserts that post-merger the buyer will be able to increase the prices of super premium vodka. Under the consent agreement, Pernot Ricard must end its distribution agreement for Stolichnaya within 6 months. The press release and Analysis to Aid Public Comment are attached. FTC Press Release (Vodka); Analysis to Aid Public Comment (Vodka).
Home / pernot ricard
Jul
25
Posted by : Matthew Wild | On : July 25, 2008
Category: Antitrust, Consent Decrees, FTC Actions, HSR Review, Mergers and Acquisitions, Relevant Markets, Section 7 (Clayton Act)
Tags:absolut, Antitrust, clayton act, ftc, hart scott rodino, HSR, matthew wild, pernot ricard, section 7, stolichnaya, v&s vin spirits, vodka